Please join our free telegram group for all the latest free trials & offers

https://t.me/phub_free

The Core Idea

The model is built to find races where the numbers clearly point to one horse being much stronger or weaker than the rest.

If a horse looks weak compared to its rivals but still short in the betting → it becomes a Lay bet (we bet against it).

If a horse looks much stronger than the rest and at a fair price → it becomes a Win bet (we back it).

If the gap between horses isn’t clear, the model simply skips the race.

After a week of reflection I think the Gap 12 Lays suit email / manual betting clients far more than the 10 or 7 variants (more volume). I will stick with 12 for emails - less bets, more precise.

Todays win & Lay selections:

WIN Selections
No bets today.

LAY GAP Selections
I spent time last night looking at the Gap 7 (sicne that version has all of the bets) and it appears if we remove all handicap races the model is much better.

Handicaps 901 lays and -27

Non-handicaps 264 lays +44.53

So based on this I think it's better if I stick with non handicaps for all 3 variations

For today that leaves:

LAY GAP 7 Selections

• 14:20 Chelt - — One Big Bang

• 14:55 Chelt - — Libberty Hunter

• 17:30 Dund - — My Cubby Bear

LAY GAP 10 Selections

• 14:20 Chelt - — One Big Bang

• 14:55 Chelt - — Libberty Hunter

LAY GAP 12 Selections

• 14:55 Chelt - — Libberty Hunter

Note: I do not lay over 10.0, bets are fired automatically at 60 seconds pre race and my results are based on this only.